Playseat Challenge X vs RacGTing 301 — Foldable Racing Cockpit Showdown
Today we’re putting two foldable racing cockpits head-to-head — the Playseat Challenge X and the RacGTing 301.
The Playseat Challenge has been a staple in the sim racing community since 2009. Only in 2021 did Playseat refresh the design with the Actifit, and in 2023, they took things further with the Challenge X.
But this time, a new contender has entered the ring — the RacGTing 301. Compact, foldable, and affordable, it aims to challenge the dominance of Playseat’s long-standing favorite. Let’s see how they compare.
🧩 Design & Build Quality
When it comes to aesthetics, the Playseat Challenge X takes the win. Its grey and blue accents paired with a glossy paint finish and a subtle Logitech logo give it a truly premium feel.
The RacGTing 301, by contrast, sticks to a more traditional black and red look. While that’s a safe and familiar choice, its paint quality and finish don’t quite match the Playseat’s refined appearance.

Still, both follow the “beach chair” design concept — lightweight, foldable, and easy to store.
⚙️ Adjustability & Configuration
Both rigs share similar adjustability features for the wheelbase holder and pedal plate, though the fine details differ.
- Wheelbase Holder:
- The Challenge X and 301 both tilt forward and back, but neither allows vertical movement.
- The 301’s wheel tray sits slightly higher, which may be uncomfortable for larger steering wheels, while the Challenge X might be less ideal for smaller, low-profile bases.
- Pedal Plate:
- Both rigs allow roughly 20 cm of depth adjustment, but the 301 offers six extra attachment points for finer tuning.
- The Challenge X gains a small advantage with its locking dimples for more secure positioning.
- Seat Recline & Comfort:
- Both allow you to sit upright or reclined, using straps to control seat tension.
- The Challenge X’s Actifit fabric keeps you cooler during long sessions, but its deep recline may cause back or neck strain for some.
- The RacGTing 301’s Alcantara-style upholstery is soft and padded, offering a luxurious feel. It also features a tilting backrest — a great advantage for VR users.
🪶 Comfort & Ergonomics
Comfort is subjective, but both seats perform well for long sessions.
The Actifit material on the Challenge X is breathable and supportive — great for hot days or endurance stints. The 301, on the other hand, feels plush and soft with its padded Alcantara-style finish.
Where the 301 shines is in its adjustable backrest angle, allowing better customization for VR or different seating styles.
🛞 Pedal Plate & Wheelbase Stability
Here’s where functionality meets physics:
- Playseat Challenge X:
- Pedals are bolted in without a full plate — this minimal design can cause noticeable flex under heavy braking.
- Overhanging pedals (like Fanatec’s) rely heavily on the pedal front plate for support.
- RacGTing 301:
- Uses a solid pedal plate — far more stable and flex-free.
- Just make sure to level the adjustable feet to avoid wobble.
When it comes to the wheelbase mount, both rigs show some flex. The Challenge X performs slightly better, but if you plan to use anything above 8Nm, expect some chassis movement on either.
🔧 Compatibility
Playseat advertises the Challenge X as “compatible with all wheelbases and pedals” — but that’s not entirely accurate.
During testing:
- The MOZA R9 could only be mounted with 2 bolts instead of 4.
- Fanatec CSL LC pedals needed improvisation to fit properly.
Meanwhile, the RacGTing 301 impressed with full compatibility across Thrustmaster, Logitech, MOZA, Simagic, and Cammus — with multiple bolt options.
✅ Winner for compatibility: RacGTing 301.
📦 Included Features & Accessories
Both come as complete packages — ready for action.
- Playseat Challenge X: Includes cable holders and a small shifter mount (ideal for Logitech shifters).
- RacGTing 301: Includes shifter mount, red cable ties, mounting bolts, and all necessary tools.
The 301 wins slightly for completeness and practicality.
🔄 Foldability & Storage
This is where both rigs truly shine — and why they’re so popular.
Both can be set up or folded in under a minute, perfect for sim racers without permanent setups.
However, the 301’s folded depth is 10 cm less than the Challenge X — an impressive feat that makes it even easier to store in tight spaces.
| Spec | Playseat Challenge X | RacGTing 301 |
|---|---|---|
| Folded Depth | 44 cm | 34 cm |
| Width | 60 cm (no shifter) | 74 cm (with shifter) |
| Height | 130 cm | 130 cm |
| Setup Time | < 1 minute | < 1 minute |
💰 Price & Value
- Playseat Challenge X: €270–300
- RacGTing 301: Around €200, often less with discounts or vouchers
Both are widely available — Playseat through most major retailers, and RacGTing through their official site or Amazon.
Considering the feature set, the 301 offers excellent value, while the Challenge X delivers more premium feel and brand prestige.
🏆 Conclusion
Both rigs deserve a place in the sim racing community.
The Playseat Challenge X feels more premium, with refined materials and aesthetics, while the RacGTing 301 offers better practicality, more features, and exceptional value for the price.
💬 In short:
- Choose the Playseat Challenge X if you value build quality and aesthetics.
- Choose the RacGTing 301 if you prefer flexibility, compatibility, and affordability.
With the 301 stepping up as a serious competitor, it’s safe to say — the foldable rig competition is heating up.
If you find my reviews helpful and you’re planning to buy something, using my affiliate link really helps support the channel — at no extra cost to you. Thank you!
Extra resources:
- 🎥Video
- 🛒Affiliate-link RacGTing (Voucher SDR10 for 10% off)